Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Order No. 15847 of 2024: Defeat and Inadmissibility of the Appeal

Order No. 15847 of 2024 clarifies the criteria for losing in the event of a ruling of inadmissibility of the appeal, highlighting the implications on the condemnation to legal costs and on the interpretation of Article 92 of the Italian Civil Procedure Code.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on ruling no. 17014 of 2024: the inadmissibility of the appeal due to the failure to produce the notification report.

Let us analyze the important ruling no. 17014 of 2024 by the Court of Cassation, which clarifies the consequences of the failure to produce the notification report and the inadmissibility of the appeal, highlighting the implications for legal proceedings.

Bianucci Law Firm
Analysis of Judgment No. 19795 of 2024: Inadmissibility of the Main Appeal and Delayed Nature of the Cross Appeal.

The recent ruling of the Court of Cassation clarifies the criteria for assessing the timeliness of the incidental appeal in the event of the inadmissibility of the main appeal. Let's explore the legal principles involved.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Judgment No. 18826 of 2024 on the Competing Proposal in Preventive Arrangement.

Let's analyze the recent ruling of the Court of Cassation that clarifies the non-appealability to the Court of Cassation of the declaration of inadmissibility of the competing proposal in the preventive agreement, providing insights into the rights and duties of the parties involved.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Order No. 20107 of 2024: Inadmissibility and Limits of Accounting Jurisdiction.

An in-depth analysis of Order No. 20107 of 2024, which clarifies the limits of the jurisdiction of the Court of Auditors and the implications for the appealability of decisions. Discover how the failure to appeal can affect access to the Court of Cassation.

Bianucci Law Firm
Judgment No. 19976 of 2024: Inadmissibility and Double Unified Contribution.

The ruling of the Court of Cassation clarifies the implications related to the payment of the double unified contribution in the event of the inadmissibility of the appeal. Let's explore the details and legal consequences.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on ruling no. 25048 of 30/03/2023: Inadmissibility of the appeal and referral to the competent judge.

Let's analyze ruling no. 25048 of March 30, 2023, which clarifies the procedures for the annulment of inadmissibility decisions regarding appeals and the referral of documents to the competent judge. A useful insight for understanding procedural dynamics.

Bianucci Law Firm
Wiretaps and Admissibility of Evidence: Commentary on Ruling No. 24492 of 2023

The recent ruling of the Court of Cassation clarifies the issue of the inadmissibility of wiretaps and the principle of derived invalidity, providing a significant interpretation for criminal proceedings.

Bianucci Law Firm
Wiretapping and Admissibility of Evidence: Commentary on Judgment No. 25592 of 2023

The ruling no. 25592 of 2023 by the Court of Cassation clarifies the inadmissibility of evidence obtained through interceptions in the absence of a valid title for the devices. Let’s explore the legal implications of this decision together.

Bianucci Law Firm
Judgment No. 50474 of 2023: Jurisdiction in the Electronic Filing of the Appeal Document.

The recent ruling no. 50474 of 2023 clarifies the competence of the appellate judge regarding the inadmissibility of appeals filed late. Let’s explore the meaning and implications of this decision.