Let us analyze the recent ruling of the Court of Cassation that clarifies the importance of ownership of property rights in lease agreements and its implications in relations with the sublessee.
Let us analyze the recent ruling of the Court of Cassation regarding the contestation of shares in judicial division, highlighting the importance of the validity of orders in case of dissent.
The recent ruling of the Court of Appeal of Potenza clarifies the methods for creating agricultural local roads and the legal implications related to incidental ownership, particularly examining the respect for social function and the conflict with Article 42 of the Constitution.
The ruling no. 18681 of 2024 clarifies the importance of identifying the property in preliminary contracts, establishing that the subject must clearly emerge from the preliminary agreement itself, in accordance with the provisions of the Civil Code.
Order No. 17813 of 2024 clarifies the rights of third-party owners in the event of seizure and confiscation, highlighting the need for a preliminary step before the criminal judge to demonstrate good faith.
Analysis of the recent Order No. 17758 of 2024 by the Court of Cassation regarding the violation of legal distances and the existence of damage, with particular attention to the criteria for proof and compensation.
An analysis of order no. 17585 of 2024, which clarifies the limits of amicable agreements for determining compensation in cases of expropriation for public utility, emphasizing liability for damages and property values.
Order No. 15906 of 2024 clarifies the right of lateral view for apartment owners in condominiums, emphasizing the importance of light and air for the livability of living spaces.
Let’s discover the meaning of the recent ruling no. 19505 of 2024, which clarifies the implementation methods of the pledge of productive movable assets and the distinction from non-possessory pledge. An important decision for the real security law.
Analysis of judgment no. 18683 of 2024 declaring the invalidity of a trademark registration due to misleading the public, clarifying the legal and commercial implications of such a decision.