Welcome to our page dedicated to detention laws. Here you will find a variety of legal articles and case studies discussing the regulations and legislation surrounding detention in the legal system.
The recent ruling no. 24020 of 2023 clarifies important aspects regarding compensation for wrongful detention and legal costs borne by the public administration. Let's explore the significance of this decision together.
The recent ruling of the Court of Cassation clarifies the conditions for the right to compensation for wrongful detention, highlighting how jurisprudential changes can influence decisions regarding personal liberty.
The recent ruling of the Court of Cassation clarifies important aspects regarding compensation for wrongful detention, highlighting the conditions for the deductibility of the indemnity and the formation of res judicata.
The recent ruling of the Court of Cassation clarifies the role of the accused's silence in the unjust detention proceedings, highlighting the importance of the legislative amendment of 2021 and its consequences on the recognition of compensation.
Let's explore ruling no. 49757 of 2023, which clarifies the competencies of the public prosecutor in cases of the detention of a suspect executed in the territory of another jurisdiction.
We analyze ruling no. 51273 of 2023, which clarifies the applicability of Article 581, paragraph 1-ter, of the Code of Criminal Procedure regarding the notification of appeal acts for detained defendants.
Let's analyze the very recent ruling of the Court of Cassation regarding Article 41-bis of the prison system and the implications on the presumption of dangerousness of those sentenced to life imprisonment.
Let's analyze ruling no. 16867 of 2024, which clarifies the methods of liquidating legal expenses in the case of compensation for wrongful detention and the implications of the principle of correlation.
The recent ruling of the Court of Appeal of Milan clarifies the right to compensation for wrongful detention, even in the case of passive extradition, expanding protections for citizens involved in such proceedings.
Judgment No. 15939 of 2024 clarifies the role of the electronic bracelet in house arrest, highlighting that it does not constitute a new coercive measure, but rather a mode of execution of the house arrest precaution.