The ruling no. 17122 of 2024 clarifies the unenforceability of contractual clauses regarding the governing law of the contract against creditors in the event of a revocation action, analyzing the context of contractual obligations and European regulations.
Let's analyze ordinance no. 16980 of 2024, which clarifies the principle of unjust enrichment in the case of healthcare services provided without accreditation, highlighting the legal implications and consequences for healthcare facilities.
The recent ruling of the Court of Appeal of Bari clarifies the importance of including disputed claims in the classes of the preventive agreement, ensuring transparency and fairness in the procedure.
Order No. 18760 of 2024 provides important clarifications on the regulation of claims for the admission of pre-deductible credits, highlighting the presumption of guilt in case of delay in submitting the application. Let's explore the meaning of these provisions in the context of bankruptcy.
Discover the meaning of Ordinance No. 18522 of 2024 regarding the notice to creditors in extraordinary administration, a crucial aspect for the protection of creditors' rights and the transparency of the bankruptcy procedure.
The ruling of the Court of Cassation of July 5, 2024 provides important clarifications on the nature of the receivables subject to securitization and on the impossibility for the assigned debtor to raise counterclaims against the securitization company.
An analysis of judgment no. 17962 of 2024 that clarifies the conditions for recognizing pre-emption in the preventive agreement, providing useful guidance for professionals and debtors.
Let's analyze the recent ruling of the Court of Cassation that clarifies the standing of creditors in the context of preventive composition, providing relevant insights for legal practice.
Let’s analyze Order No. 16445 of 2024 from the Court of Cassation, which provides important clarifications on the conclusion of credit opening contracts prior to Law No. 154 of 1992. We will explore the legal implications and the admissible modes of proof.
The Court of Cassation clarifies the limits of the creditor's liability in case of failure to pursue the guarantor, establishing that good faith cannot be invoked without specific objections.