Judgment No. 26807 of 2023 highlights important principles regarding the statute of limitations and ongoing offenses, emphasizing the autonomy of criminal offenses and the consequences for the admissibility of appeals. Let us explore the implications of this decision by the Court of Cassation.
Let us analyze ruling no. 27372 of 2023, which clarifies the relationship between the misappropriation of LPG containers and the administrative offense of using cylinders without authorization, highlighting the distinction between the two cases.
Analysis of ruling no. 27098 of 2023, which clarifies the effects of repeated recidivism in the context of continued offenses and the limits imposed by the Italian Penal Code.
The Court of Cassation, with ruling no. 28269 of May 31, 2023, clarifies the criteria for the configuration of the mitigating circumstance of minor damage in the context of the crime of robbery, highlighting the importance of a comprehensive assessment of the harmful event.
The recent ruling of the Court of Appeal of Catanzaro clarifies how the crime of stalking can coincide with that of defamation, shedding new light on repeated harassment and its legal configurability.
An analysis of ruling no. 50257 of 2023 on the configurability of drug offenses, with particular attention to the concept of minor significance and the overall assessment of the defendant's conduct.
Judgment no. 51735 of 2023 clarifies how the assessment of property damage should occur in cases of continued offenses, highlighting the importance of considering each individual offense and not the overall damage.
Let's analyze ruling no. 49478 of 2023, which clarifies the configurability of multiple attempted crimes in the case of extortion, highlighting the importance of assessing the damage for the mitigating factor referred to in art. 62, n. 4, of the penal code.
The recent ruling of the Court of Cassation clarifies the consequences of waiving the grounds for appeal in relation to ongoing offenses and the duration of the unlawful conduct.
The recent ruling of the Naples Court clarifies the jurisdiction of the Preliminary Investigating Judge in the request for immediate trial for direct summons offenses, highlighting the importance of a correct interpretation of procedural norms.