Bianucci Law Firm
International Child Abduction: Analysis of the Cassation Court Ruling No. 32411/2019.

The ruling of the Court of Cassation on the case of international child abduction sheds light on the complexities related to parental responsibility and the protection of the psychological well-being of the minors involved.

Bianucci Law Firm
Parental Authority and International Abduction of Minors: Commentary on Cass. civ., Ord. No. 30123 of 2017.

An analysis of the Supreme Court ruling on the concept of habitual residence of the minor in cases of international abduction, with references to Italian and European regulations.

Bianucci Law Firm
Child custody: commentary on the ruling Cass. Civ. n. 5738 of 2023.

The ruling of the Court of Cassation on the equal placement of minors highlights the importance of considering the best interests of the child and family dynamics. Let's analyze the key points of the decision.

Bianucci Law Firm
Analysis of the Judgment of the Court of Cassation, Criminal Section No. 4439 of 2005: Failure to Execute Judicial Provisions.

The 2005 ruling of the Supreme Court provides important insights into parental responsibility and the best interest of the child in custody disputes. Let us examine the case of M. D. and the legal implications in decisions regarding visitation rights.

Bianucci Law Firm
International Child Abduction: Analysis of the Judgment of the Italian Supreme Court No. 31470 of 2023.

The ruling of the Court of Cassation in 2023 clarifies the criteria for 'habitual residence' and the importance of hearing minors in cases of international abduction, emphasizing the concept of 'the best interest of the child.

Bianucci Law Firm
Analysis of Judgment No. 38481 of 2023: Appeals for Civil Interests and New Regulations

Judgment No. 38481 of 2023 provides important clarifications on the applicability of Article 573, paragraph 1-bis, of the Code of Criminal Procedure for civil appeals, especially following recent legislative amendments.

Bianucci Law Firm
Analysis of Judgment No. 19015 of 2024: Forced Execution and Legal Interests

Judgment No. 19015 of 2024 clarifies the limitations of the creditor in forced execution for legal interests, highlighting the relevant regulatory and jurisprudential boundaries.

Bianucci Law Firm
Order No. 18037 of 2024: Financial Leasing and Anti-Usury Regulation

Order No. 18037 of 2024 clarifies the distinction between penalties for non-compliance and usurious interest rates in financial leasing, providing important guidance for contractual practices.

Bianucci Law Firm
Analysis of Judgment No. 16604 of 2024: Banking Contracts and Determination of Interest.

Let's explore the importance of the recent ruling no. 16604 of 2024 regarding banking contracts, with a particular focus on the determination of interest in the absence of agreements between the parties.

Bianucci Law Firm
Ultra-legal interests in banking contracts: commentary on Order No. 16456 of 2024.

Order no. 16456 of 2024 by the Court of Cassation clarifies the methods for indicating extra-legal interests in banking contracts, establishing that mere numerical indication is not necessary, but referring to objective criteria is sufficient.