Let's analyze ruling no. 526 of the Court of Cassation from 2025, which offers important insights on the liability of directors in cases of tax evasion and the application of thresholds for punishment.
Analysis of the Supreme Court ruling regarding the figure of the de facto administrator and the implications of fraudulent bankruptcy, highlighting the dynamics of liability and prescription.
The ruling of the Court of Cassation on the case of fraudulent bankruptcy documentation offers important insights regarding de facto administration and the criminal liability of directors. Let’s explore the details and legal implications.
The ruling no. 7417 of 2023 by the Court of Cassation analyzes the boundaries between fraudulent bankruptcy and simple bankruptcy, clarifying the roles of the directors in the management of companies in crisis. A necessary in-depth analysis to understand criminal liabilities in bankruptcy matters.
The ruling of the Court of Cassation in 2024 provides significant insights on criminal liability in cases of fraudulent bankruptcy, exploring the concept of de facto administrator and management duties.
Let's analyze ruling no. 26415/2024, which clarifies the boundaries of asset infidelity and the responsibilities of directors in cases of conflict of interest, illustrating the financial and legal consequences for the companies involved.
Let's analyze the ruling of the Court of Cassation no. 17113/2024, which clarifies the dynamics of procedural representation in the case of the appointment of a support administrator for an adult. An important reflection on procedural capacity and the rights of people with disabilities.
An in-depth analysis of the importance of the passive legitimacy of the administrator in the case of negative and confessional actions regarding servitudes, as established by the recent ruling of the Court of Cassation.
Analysis of the recent ruling on the payment of the judicial administrator's fee in cases of preventive seizure, with a focus on regulatory and jurisprudential implications.
The order of the Court of Naples clarifies the prerequisites for the allocation of compensation to the judicial administrator of seized assets, highlighting the importance of compliance with the judge's directives and legality.