Bianucci Law Firm
Criminal Court, Section III, Judgment No. 526/2025: Reflections on Criminal Liability for Tax Evasion

Let's analyze ruling no. 526 of the Court of Cassation from 2025, which offers important insights on the liability of directors in cases of tax evasion and the application of thresholds for punishment.

Bianucci Law Firm
Fraudulent bankruptcy: commentary on the ruling Cass. pen. no. 36582 of 2024

Analysis of the Supreme Court ruling regarding the figure of the de facto administrator and the implications of fraudulent bankruptcy, highlighting the dynamics of liability and prescription.

Bianucci Law Firm
Fraudulent Bankruptcy: Analysis of the Judgment of the Court of Cassation, Criminal Section No. 34811 of 2024

The ruling of the Court of Cassation on the case of fraudulent bankruptcy documentation offers important insights regarding de facto administration and the criminal liability of directors. Let’s explore the details and legal implications.

Bianucci Law Firm
Analysis of the Judgment of the Court of Cassation, Criminal Section V, No. 7417 of 2023: Fraudulent Bankruptcy and the Role of Directors.

The ruling no. 7417 of 2023 by the Court of Cassation analyzes the boundaries between fraudulent bankruptcy and simple bankruptcy, clarifying the roles of the directors in the management of companies in crisis. A necessary in-depth analysis to understand criminal liabilities in bankruptcy matters.

Bianucci Law Firm
Analysis of the Judgment of the Court of Cassation, Criminal Section I, No. 36521 of 2024: Liability for Fraudulent Bankruptcy.

The ruling of the Court of Cassation in 2024 provides significant insights on criminal liability in cases of fraudulent bankruptcy, exploring the concept of de facto administrator and management duties.

Bianucci Law Firm
Asset Infidelity: Commentary on Judgment No. 26415 of 2024

Let's analyze ruling no. 26415/2024, which clarifies the boundaries of asset infidelity and the responsibilities of directors in cases of conflict of interest, illustrating the financial and legal consequences for the companies involved.

Bianucci Law Firm
Procedural Representation and Support Administration: Commentary on Judgment No. 17113 of 2024.

Let's analyze the ruling of the Court of Cassation no. 17113/2024, which clarifies the dynamics of procedural representation in the case of the appointment of a support administrator for an adult. An important reflection on procedural capacity and the rights of people with disabilities.

Bianucci Law Firm
Legitimacy of the Condominium Administrator: Commentary on Ordinance No. 21506 of 2024.

An in-depth analysis of the importance of the passive legitimacy of the administrator in the case of negative and confessional actions regarding servitudes, as established by the recent ruling of the Court of Cassation.

Bianucci Law Firm
Compensation of the Judicial Administrator: Commentary on Order No. 20975 of 2024

Analysis of the recent ruling on the payment of the judicial administrator's fee in cases of preventive seizure, with a focus on regulatory and jurisprudential implications.

Bianucci Law Firm
Order No. 18133 of 2024: Compensation of the Judicial Administrator and Legal Obligations

The order of the Court of Naples clarifies the prerequisites for the allocation of compensation to the judicial administrator of seized assets, highlighting the importance of compliance with the judge's directives and legality.