Welcome to our curated page on embezzlement, where you can find in-depth legal articles and cases discussing this white-collar crime. Stay informed with the latest insights and analysis from our legal experts.
The recent ruling of the Court of Cassation clarifies the distinction between employees of IPAB operating under private law and the qualification of public agent, with significant implications for criminal law and the liability of public officials.
The recent ruling of the Court of Cassation clarifies the non-applicability of the crime of embezzlement for lottery ticket holders who place bets for themselves without payment, highlighting the public nature of the money in question.
The recent ruling of the Court of Cassation clarifies the boundary between the legitimate use of public funds and the crime of embezzlement, with particular reference to 'in-house' companies. An important reflection on the management of public resources.
The ruling of the Court of Cassation in 2023 provides important clarifications on the configurability of the crime of embezzlement in relation to the appropriation of intangible assets, highlighting the issues related to the improper use of tax credits by public officials.
Let us analyze ruling no. 27372 of 2023, which clarifies the relationship between the misappropriation of LPG containers and the administrative offense of using cylinders without authorization, highlighting the distinction between the two cases.
Judgment no. 49984 of November 16, 2023 provides important clarifications on the admissibility in the case of late filing of the complaint, highlighting the conditions under which the appellate judge is not required to renew the proceedings. Let us analyze the legal implications of this decision.
The recent ruling no. 14874 of 2024 clarifies the legal boundaries of misappropriation in assisted financing for SMEs affected by the pandemic, highlighting the responsibilities of professionals in managing public resources.
Let's analyze the recent ruling of the Court of Cassation that distinguishes between theft and embezzlement, clarifying the boundaries of public officials' responsibilities in their actions. An emblematic case provides important points for reflection.
The recent ruling of the Court of Cassation clarifies the conditions for the integration of the crime of misuse of public funds by public officials, highlighting the distinction between public and private interest.
The ruling of the Court of Cassation of November 16, 2023 provides important insights into the subjective element of the crime of embezzlement, clarifying the interpretative challenges related to the conduct of the public official and their intent to appropriate.