Warning: Undefined array key "HTTP_ACCEPT_LANGUAGE" in /home/stud330394/public_html/template/header.php on line 25

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/stud330394/public_html/template/header.php:25) in /home/stud330394/public_html/template/header.php on line 61
Аналіз рішення Кас. крим., секція III, № 37642 2024 року: Податкове ухилення та роль професіоналів. | Адвокатське бюро Б'януччі

Analysis of Judgment Cass. pen., Section III, no. 37642 of 2024: Tax Evasion and the Role of Professionals

Judgment no. 37642 of the Court of Cassation, issued on June 6, 2024, offers a fundamental insight for reflecting on criminal liability related to tax evasion, especially concerning the role of professionals. In this article, we will examine the key points of the judgment and its legal consequences, aiming to make the discussion accessible to everyone.

Context of the Judgment

The Court dealt with the case of three defendants, including an accountant (B.B.), involved in tax evasion practices for the 2014 tax period. The appellate judgment had confirmed the convictions for offenses under Legislative Decree no. 74 of 2000, particularly for filing fraudulent tax returns. The appellants contested the decision, arguing the absence of fraudulent conduct and the lack of specific intent.

Role of Professionals and Criminal Liability

Mere knowledge of another's illicit activity is not sufficient to constitute the professional's complicity in a tax crime.

A crucial aspect of the judgment concerns the role of tax consultants in carrying out illicit conduct. The Court clarified that the professional must have an active and conscious role in the commission of the crime to be convicted. In this case, the defendant B.B. was held responsible not only for his position as an accountant but also for his direct involvement in the evasive practices.

Points for Reflection from the Judgment

  • The Court confirmed that the mere violation of invoicing obligations does not automatically constitute the crime of tax evasion.
  • It is necessary to prove the conduct's suitability to mislead the tax administration; the mere discovery of the crime is not sufficient.
  • The accountant must demonstrate that they acted without awareness of the illicit nature of the actions to avoid being considered an accomplice.

The judgment reiterates the importance of proper accounting and absolute transparency in tax operations. The Court of Cassation highlighted that fraudulent conduct must be clearly proven and that the professional must assume an active and conscious role.

Conclusions

In summary, judgment no. 37642 of 2024 by the Court of Cassation represents an important milestone in the jurisprudence concerning tax evasion and the role of professionals. It is essential for accountants and tax consultants to operate with the utmost integrity, avoiding conduct that could be interpreted as complicity in illicit activities. Clarity and correct management of tax information are essential to ensure legality and transparency in the sector.

Адвокатське бюро Б'януччі