Warning: Undefined array key "HTTP_ACCEPT_LANGUAGE" in /home/stud330394/public_html/template/header.php on line 25

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/stud330394/public_html/template/header.php:25) in /home/stud330394/public_html/template/header.php on line 61
Prison Visits: Ruling No. 35470 of 2023 and Exceptional Circumstances | Bianucci Law Firm

Prison Visits: Sentence No. 35470 of 2023 and Exceptional Circumstances

Sentence No. 35470 of March 24, 2023, filed on August 23, 2023, offers significant insights into the regulation of prison visits, particularly regarding the possibility of extending them in the presence of "exceptional circumstances." This ruling by the Supervisory Court of Rome rejects the idea of permanent authorization, emphasizing the importance of a case-by-case assessment.

Regulatory Context

According to Article 37, paragraph 10, of Presidential Decree No. 230 of June 30, 2000, it is provided that visits with inmates may be extended in extraordinary situations. However, the sentence highlights that such an extension cannot be granted automatically or permanently but must be authorized each time, after verification of the specific circumstances.

01 President: ROCCHI GIACOMO. Rapporteur: CALASELICE BARBARA. Defendant: CUCCARO LUIGI. Public Prosecutor: ODELLO LUCIA. (Partial Dissent) Rejects, SUPERVISORY COURT OF ROME, 09/29/2022 563000 INSTITUTIONS FOR PREVENTION AND PUNISHMENT (PENAL SYSTEM) - Visits - Extension for "exceptional circumstances" - Permanent authorization - Exclusion - Verification for each individual visit - Necessity - Case law. In the context of the penal system, the extension of a visit, pursuant to Article 37, paragraph 10, first part, of Presidential Decree No. 230 of June 30, 2000, may be authorized not permanently, but from time to time, after verification of the occurrence of "exceptional circumstances." (Case law where it was excluded that the health conditions of the inmate's family member could justify the permanent extension of the visit).

Practical Implications of the Sentence

The decision of the Supervisory Court of Rome has relevant practical repercussions. It clarifies that the health conditions of an inmate's family member, while significant, cannot justify an automatic extension of the visit. This leads to several considerations:

  • Necessity of a case-by-case assessment for each extension request.
  • Strengthening of the regulatory framework for the penal system.
  • Potential appeals and challenges by inmates and their families in case of denial.

Conclusions

Sentence No. 35470 of 2023 represents an important step forward in clarifying the rules governing prison visits. It reiterates the need for careful and situational management of extension requests, avoiding interpretations that could lead to unjustified privileges. In a sensitive legal context such as the penitentiary system, every decision must be weighed and justified, ensuring respect for the law and the rights of inmates.

Bianucci Law Firm