Welcome to our curated collection of articles and cases focusing on environmental law. Stay informed on the latest legal developments in this crucial area of law.
Analysis of ordinance no. 20488 of 2023 that clarifies the relationship between the Landscape Plan and the Park Plan, highlighting the regulatory hierarchy concerning the protection of protected areas.
Let's analyze the recent ruling no. 31108 of 2024 regarding waste classification, with particular attention to the distinction between agricultural materials and liquid fuels.
The recent ruling of the Court of Appeals of Venice clarifies responsibility in the case of waste abandoned on confiscated land, highlighting the obligations arising from municipal orders.
The recent ruling of the Court of Cassation clarifies the importance of the building permit in areas subject to landscape plans that have been adopted but not yet approved, emphasizing the need to protect the environmental heritage.
Let's analyze ruling no. 29076 of 2024, which declares the use of the approximate method for calculating waste inadmissible, highlighting the legal and regulatory implications in the management of illegal disposal.
Let's analyze the ruling of the Court of Cassation that clarifies the limits of reviewability of abandonment and uncontrolled waste disposal behaviors according to Legislative Decree No. 152 of 2006.
The ruling no. 30930 of 2024 clarifies the responsibility of the legal representative in the case of environmental violations, even in the presence of delegated functions. Let's explore the meaning of this decision.
An analysis of order no. 21495 of 2024 that clarifies the jurisdiction between the ordinary judge and the regional court for disputes concerning the limits of the bed and banks of public watercourses, highlighting the need for technical investigations.
The recent ruling of the Court of Cassation clarifies the jurisdiction of the ordinary judge in disputes between private parties regarding pollution emissions, highlighting the importance of injunctive and compensatory actions without diminishing the protections for subjective rights.
The recent ruling of the Supreme Court provides important clarifications on the distinction between the concession fee and the additional tariff component for mineral waters, highlighting the importance of a correct interpretation of local regulations.