Military Jurisdiction in Peculation: Analysis of Judgment 20317 of 2025
Discover how the Court of Cassation, with Judgment No. 20317 of 2025, has clarified the boundaries between ordinary and military jurisdiction in cases of embezzlement. Delve into the principle of speciality and the importance of the service member's status and the asset's ownership for the correct attribution of jurisdiction.
The Continuation of the Offense and the Execution Judge: The Court of Cassation's Clarity No. 19390/2025
The Supreme Court, with Judgment No. 19390/2025, defines the limits of the Enforcement Judge in recognizing the binding nature of the continuation, excluding the consideration of precautionary measures following irrevocable judgments. An in-depth analysis to understand the implications of this important decision.
Fraud and the Omissive Dispositive Act: Analysis of Cassation Judgment No. 20249 of 2025
Explore how the Court of Cassation, with the Cassation Judgment No. 20249 of 2025, has redefined the boundaries of the crime of fraud, recognizing the validity of the omissive patrimonial disposition act. A crucial analysis to understand the new frontiers of protection against fraud.
The Qualification of Public Service Officer: Judgment 20127/2025 and the Role of CUP Employees
An important decision by the Court of Cassation, judgment no. 20127 of 2025, clarifies the boundaries of the qualification of public service officer for healthcare company employees working at the CUP, analyzing autonomy and discretion. Discover the implications for crimes against Public Administration.
The Court of Cassation clarifies the Roman salute: Judgment No. 19342/2025 and the crime of fascist apologism
The Court of Cassation, with judgment no. 19342 of 2025, reaffirms the configurability of the crime of fascist apologism for those who participate in demonstrations with evocative symbols and gestures, such as the 'Roman salute' and the 'present-day call', in order to safeguard the constitutional values of dignity and equality. An in-depth analysis of the decision that safeguards democracy.
Defamation by press and preliminary investigations: the limits of the right to report in Ruling 19102/2025
The Court of Cassation, with ruling no. 19102/2025, redefines the boundaries of the right to judicial reporting during preliminary investigations, emphasizing the presumption of innocence and the need for an objective account. A crucial analysis for journalists and citizens.
Fraudulent Transfer of Assets: When Repetition Constitutes Multiple Crimes According to the Supreme Court (Judgment 18413/2025)
The Supreme Court, with judgment no. 18413/2025, clearly outlines the boundaries of fraudulent asset transfer, establishing when the repetition of fictitious ownership of assets and companies gives rise to multiple autonomous crimes, with significant consequences in terms of statute of limitations and criminal liability. A crucial analysis for understanding the fight against economic crime.
The Unfinished Attempted Extortion: Analysis of Supreme Court Ruling no. 18578/2025
The Court of Cassation, with ruling no. 18578/2025, clarifies the boundaries of 'unfinished' attempt in the crime of extortion, outlining when a threat not followed by a request for money can constitute the offense. An in-depth analysis to understand the legal implications of only partially completed conduct.
Home Invasion and Building Trespass: The Court of Cassation Clarifies the Concurrence of Crimes with Ruling No. 17653/2025
The Court of Cassation, with the recent ruling No. 17653 of 2025, has provided an important interpretation on the relationship between the crime of home invasion and that of building trespass, establishing their full concurrence. Let's explore the implications of this decision for the protection of property and individual liberty.
Mafia-political electoral exchange: The Supreme Court of Cassation and the boundaries of Article 416-ter of the Penal Code in Judgment 17870/2025
The Court of Cassation, with Judgment 17870/2025, decisively clarifies the requirements for the establishment of the offense of electoral-political-mafioso exchange, distinguishing between the role of the vote broker affiliated with a mafia association and that of one who operates 'uti singulus'. A landmark ruling for legality and democratic transparency.