Administrative Detention of Foreigners: The Court of Cassation's Judgment No. 18637 of 2025 and Judicial Review
An in-depth analysis of the Court of Cassation's 18637/2025 ruling on the administrative detention of foreigners. Discover how the judiciary ensures respect for fundamental rights, the importance of legality review, and the allocation of the burdens of proof between the Administration and the foreign national in the new legal framework.
Administrative Detention and the Asylum Application: The Burden of Pleading (Court of Cassation No. 18274 of 2025)
An in-depth analysis of the Court of Cassation's recent ruling clarifying the requirements for examining the application for international protection during administrative detention, emphasizing the importance of the burden of adducing the relevant facts for asylum seekers in Italy. Discover how case law evolves in the field of immigration law.
The Duration of Administrative Detention of Applicants for International Protection: Judgment 17508/2025
An important ruling by the Supreme Court clarifies the time limits of the 'secondary' administrative detention for foreign nationals who submit an application for international protection while they are already in a Center for Permanence for Repatriation (CPR). Discover the implications of Judgment No. 17508 of 2025 and how it affects the rights of asylum seekers in Italy.
International Protection and Detention: The Court of Cassation Clarifies the Terms with Judgment No. 16529/2025
An in-depth analysis of the Court of Cassation ruling 16529/2025 that redefines the terms for the request for international protection during administrative detention. Discover the implications for asylum seekers and the authorities, between fundamental rights and expulsion procedures.
Detention of Foreign Nationals and Right of Defence: analysis of Court of Cassation No. 16440/2025
The Court of Cassation, with judgment 16440/2025, clarifies the defence guarantees of a foreign national detained under Law 187/2024: the sole presence of an interpreter at the validation hearing may suffice, provided it ensures full understanding of the reasons for the measure and the outcome of the proceedings.