Warning: Undefined array key "HTTP_ACCEPT_LANGUAGE" in /home/stud330394/public_html/template/header.php on line 25

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/stud330394/public_html/template/header.php:25) in /home/stud330394/public_html/template/header.php on line 59
Criminal, Family Law Blog - Bianucci Law Firm
Bianucci Law Firm
Postponement of Sentence Execution due to Severe Illness: The Cassation Court's Interpretation in Ruling no. 11725/2025

The Court of Cassation, with Ruling no. 11725/2025, outlines the criteria for the discretionary postponement of sentence execution due to serious illness, balancing the convicted person's right to health with the community's security needs. An in-depth analysis to understand the limits and conditions of this delicate measure.

Bianucci Law Firm
Substitute Penalties and Health Conditions of the Convicted: The Court of Cassation's Approach with Judgment 11973/2025

The Court of Cassation, with judgment no. 11973 of 2025, clarifies in which circumstances the health conditions of a convicted person can influence the granting of substitute penalties for short detentions, emphasizing the importance of the rehabilitative path and reliability in fulfilling prescriptions. An in-depth analysis to understand the limits and opportunities offered by current legislation.

Bianucci Law Firm
Medical liability and damage from unwanted birth: commentary on order no. 1903 of 2025.

The ruling of the Supreme Court clarifies the prerequisites for civil liability in the event of harm from unwanted birth, delving into the role of medical information and the burden of proof.

Bianucci Law Firm
Transfusion damage: commentary on ordinance no. 535 of 2025

The ordinance of the Court of Cassation clarifies the absence of obligation for the Ministry of Health to accept settlement proposals in cases of transfusion damage, highlighting the need for specific forms and procedures.

Bianucci Law Firm
Dog Owner's Liability: The Cassation Court Ruling no. 9620/2025 on Negligent Injury

The Supreme Court of Cassation, with ruling no. 9620 of 2025, reiterates and clarifies the guarantor position of a dog's keeper, outlining the duties of custody and supervision to prevent attacks and the related criminal consequences in case of negligent injury. Essential insight for owners and victims.

Bianucci Law Firm
Qualification of Public Official and Official Secret: Analysis of Judgment no. 10398/2025

The Court of Cassation clarifies when a healthcare manager can be considered a public official and liable for the crime of disclosure of official secrets: focus on personnel selection, art. 326 c.p. and the relevance of the public nature of healthcare functions.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Judgment No. 44361 of 2024: Nullity of the Chamber Procedure in Pandemic Times

Let's examine judgment no. 44361 of 2024, which highlights the nullity of the non-participated chamber judgment when the presence of the defense counsel is not guaranteed, in a context of pandemic emergency.

Bianucci Law Firm
The Supreme Court on Slight Negligence: The Healthcare Professional's Interest in Appealing in Ruling 10899/2025

The recent ruling of the Supreme Court no. 10899/2025 clarifies a crucial aspect for healthcare professionals: the interest in appealing an acquittal for non-punishability due to slight negligence. Discover why obtaining a broader acquittal formula can make a difference in civil, administrative, and disciplinary proceedings, protecting the doctor's reputation and professional future.

Bianucci Law Firm
Court of Cassation No. 34570/2023: Clarifications on the Statute of Limitations for Compensation Rights in Case of Contaminated Blood Transfusion.

The ruling of the Court of Cassation of October 3, 2023 provides important clarifications on the start of the statute of limitations for damages from blood transfusions, emphasizing the need for a correct identification of the dies a quo and the importance of the awareness of the damage.

Bianucci Law Firm
Analysis of the Judgment of the Court of Cassation, Civil Section III, No. 12908 of 2022: Validity of the Claims Made Clause.

The 2022 ruling of the Court of Cassation provides important clarifications on the legitimacy of claims-made clauses in insurance contracts. Let’s explore the key aspects and implications for the parties involved.