The recent judgment No. 21408 of April 12, 2023, by the Court of Appeal of Salerno offers an important reflection on the court's jurisdiction in matters of preventive measures. This topic is of particular interest to legal professionals, as it highlights the implications of the "cognitio plena" principle and its impact on judicial decisions.
The Court clarified that, within the scope of appeals concerning preventive measures, it exercises full jurisdiction. This principle allows the court to examine and evaluate facts and evidence that the first judge may have overlooked. In the specific case examined, the focus was on an expenditure not considered in the assessment of the defendant's income, which led to a reassessment of the overall economic situation.
Court of Appeal - "Cognitio plena" within the scope of the devolved matter - Existence - Consequences - Specific case. Even in the area of preventive measures, the Court of Appeal has full jurisdiction, albeit limited, by virtue of the devolutive effect, by the points and issues under appeal, which allows it to evaluate facts and evidence resulting from the case file, even if overlooked by the first judge (in this case, an expenditure not considered in the examination of income data).
The consequences of the judgment are manifold and concern various aspects of criminal proceedings. Among the most relevant are:
These aspects emphasize the importance of adequate preparation during the appeal phase, where every piece of evidence can have a significant impact on the outcome of the proceedings.
In conclusion, judgment No. 21408 of 2023 marks an important step in Italian jurisprudence regarding preventive measures. The full jurisdiction recognized to the Court of Appeal allows for a more accurate reassessment of evidence, contributing to ensuring a fair and just process. Lawyers and legal professionals must pay particular attention to this aspect, as every detail can prove crucial for the defense of their clients.