Judgment No. 32039 of July 8, 2024, by the Court of Cassation provides important clarifications regarding family assistance obligations and the configuration of the crime of failure to pay alimony. This issue is of particular relevance for families in situations of separation or divorce, where compliance with financial obligations becomes crucial to ensure the well-being of minor children.
The Court analyzed the conduct of a parent who failed to pay the alimony established in civil proceedings for their minor children. According to the Court, such conduct constitutes the felony provided for by Article 570, paragraph two, no. 2, of the Criminal Code, while the crime of violation of family assistance obligations, under Article 570-bis, is absorbed into the former. This clarification is fundamental for understanding the distinctions between the various forms of violation of family assistance obligations.
Minor children - Failure to pay alimony awarded in civil proceedings - Lack of means of subsistence - Art. 570, paragraph two, no. 2, of the Criminal Code - Configurability - Existence - Felony under Art. 570-bis, of the Criminal Code - Absorption - Reasons. The conduct of an agent who fails to pay, in favor of minor children, the alimony awarded in civil proceedings constitutes the felony under Art. 570, paragraph two, no. 2, of the Criminal Code, and not also that of violation of family assistance obligations, as the crime under Art. 570-bis of the Criminal Code requires only the non-payment of alimony, while the crime of violation of family assistance obligations requires that such non-compliance results in the failure to provide the means of subsistence.
This judgment has several practical implications for separated parents. It is essential for parents to understand that the omission in paying alimony for minor children is a serious violation that can lead to criminal sanctions. The legal consequences of such an omission may include:
It is therefore essential for parents to comply with their financial obligations to avoid legal consequences and to ensure the well-being of their children.
In conclusion, judgment No. 32039 of 2024 effectively clarifies the distinction between the failure to pay alimony and the violation of family assistance obligations. This decision underscores the importance of fulfilling economic duties towards minor children, in order to avoid not only criminal penalties but also to ensure their right to a dignified life. Case law in this area continues to evolve, and it is crucial for legal professionals and families to stay informed about these developments.