Bianucci Law Firm
Analysis of Judgment No. 45413 of 2024: the Preclusive Effect of the Measures of the Enforcement Judge.

Judgment no. 45413 of 2024 provides important insights regarding the preclusive effect of the measures taken by the enforcement judge, clarifying the limits and conditions for a new decision on the same subject.

Bianucci Law Firm
Revocation of conditional suspension of the sentence: analysis of ruling no. 44296 of 2024

The recent ruling of the Court of Cassation clarifies the limits of the revocation of conditional suspension of the sentence, even in the presence of extinction of the crime, establishing fundamental principles for criminal law.

Bianucci Law Firm
Opposition to executive acts: Analysis of Order No. 19932/2024

Order No. 19932 of July 19, 2024, highlights the importance of timeliness in opposing executive acts, clarifying the obligations and deadlines for the opponent. Discover all the details and legal implications.

Bianucci Law Firm
The ruling no. 19123 of 2024: Forced execution and impossibility of performance.

Let's analyze the recent ruling no. 19123 of 2024, which clarifies the limits of forced execution in the event of loss of availability of the movable property subject to condemnation. An important decision for creditors and debtors.

Bianucci Law Firm
Analysis of Judgment No. 19015 of 2024: Forced Execution and Legal Interests

Judgment No. 19015 of 2024 clarifies the limitations of the creditor in forced execution for legal interests, highlighting the relevant regulatory and jurisprudential boundaries.

Bianucci Law Firm
Analysis of Judgment No. 18502 of 2024: Provisional Condemnation and Executory Effect

The recent ruling of the Court of Cassation clarifies the effects of the reform of provisional condemnation in appeal, excluding the revival of executive effectiveness and outlining the rights to new enforcement actions.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on the Order Judgment No. 18367 of 2024: Opposition to Execution and Autonomy of Grounds.

Analysis of the recent Order No. 18367 of 04/07/2024, which clarifies the autonomy of the grounds in opposition to enforcement and the implications for legal fees. Let’s explore the fundamental principles of this decision together.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Judgment No. 18196 of 2024: The Endo-Executive Division and the Terms of Reinstatement.

Analysis of the recent ruling of the Supreme Court of Cassation regarding the end-executive division process and the deadlines for the resumption of the enforcement process, with particular attention to the role of declaratory measures.

Bianucci Law Firm
Commentary on Judgment No. 17055 of 20/06/2024: Forced Execution and Abuse of Clauses.

Judgment No. 17055 of 2024 addresses the issue of enforcement based on an unchallenged injunction, highlighting the importance of official verification of abusive clauses in contractual matters, in accordance with Directive 93/13/EEC.

Bianucci Law Firm
Reform of the Quantum Debeatur: Judgment No. 16664 of 2024 and the Implications on Forced Execution.

The recent ruling of the Court of Appeal of Venice clarifies the consequences of the modification of the quantum debeatur on the enforcement procedure, distinguishing between an increase and a decrease of the enforceable title. Learn more in our in-depth analysis.